Eu Constitucional Law
Objectives
After completion of the course, students will become acquainted with the institutions, legal-regulatory instruments, and main concepts that inform European Union Law. They will be acquainted with the main case law of the Court of Justice and with the unique features of the Union as an advanced supranational legal system.
The offered conceptual background will furthermore allow them to reflect on and critically assess the success and limitations of the European project, as well as the most pressing issues the Union is facing in the contemporary moment and will be facing in the years to come.
General characterization
Code
27167
Credits
6
Responsible teacher
Nausica Palazzo
Hours
Weekly - 4.5
Total - 54
Teaching language
English
Prerequisites
Available soon
Bibliography
Handbook
Students must choose ONE handbook amongst the following two handbooks:
- Paul Craig and Gráinne de Búrca, EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, Oxford University Press, 2020. All chapters except 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30.
- Koen Lenaerts, Piet Van Nuffel, and Tim Corthaut, EU Constitutional Law, Oxford University Press, 2021. All parts except Part II.9,10,11; Part IV.19,20,21,22.
Case law
https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/j_6/en/ ¿ Search for a case/ Add case no. /select ¿judgement¿
- Van Gend & Loos, C-26/62 (direct applicability of the Treaty)
- Costa v. Enel, C-6/64 (primacy)
- Simmenthal, C-106/77 (primacy and immediate non-application by domestic courts)
- Tanja Kreil, C¿285/98 (primacy)
- Ratti, C-148/78 (direct effects of directives)
- Ursula Becker C-8/81 (direct effects of directive ¿plus¿)
- Faccini Dori, C-91/92 (vertical and horizontal effects)
- Opinion no. 2/2013 (accession to the ECHR)
- Srl CILFIT and Lanificio di Gavardo SpA v. Ministero della Salute, C¿283/81 (preliminary ruling)
- Francovich, C¿6/90 (state liability)
- Brasserie du pêcheur/Factortame III (state liability)
- Omega C-36/02 (fundamental rights)
- Schmidberger, C¿112/00 (fundamental rights)
- Cassis de Dijon (REWE), C¿120/78 (free movement of goods)
- Keck Mithouard, C¿267/91 (free movement of goods)
- Gebhard, C-55/94 (free movement of services)
- Vlassopoulou, C¿340/89 (free movement of services)
Other relevant material whose study is only recommended
- P. Craig, The Lisbon Treaty: Law, Politics and the Treaty Reform, OUP, 2010.
- Andrea Biondi, Piet Eeckhout, and Stefanie Ripley (eds), EU Law after Lisbon, OUP, 2012.
- EU Commission, Press Release, Rule of Law: Commission launches infringement procedure against Poland for violations of EU law by its Constitutional Tribunal, 22 Dec. 2021.
- Eric Maurice, Protecting checks and balances to save the Rule of Law, European issues, Policy Paper of the Fondation Robert Schuman, No. 590, 21st April 2021.
- Other material that will be added on moodle in the other material section, based on the most recent developments within EU law worthy of attention.
Teaching method
The course will adopt a theoretical and practical approach to the study of European Union law. Theoretical parts provide students with the necessary conceptual tools to understand EU Law. The more practical analysis consists of reading sources of law (e.g. Treaty provisions) and, most importantly, relevant case law to understand how law practitioners operationalize the studied concepts.
Each learning block usually contains a class session devoted to reading the main case law in the area at issue. The class session is called Case Law Lab (CLL). Students are expected to read the selected judicial decision(s) and engage in constructive discussion during this practical class. Class participation is encouraged and a structural part of the learning experience. Participation is facilitated by the mandatory study of assigned readings before class.
Evaluation method
Continuous assessment
Students¿ participation in the EU Law Pills Project (20 % of the final grade) (up to 4 points).
- Multiple-choice test (50% of the final grade) (up to 10 points), to be held on the last day of class. The test covers the content of the course (except for the content of the last class) and is worth 50% of the final grade.
The test lasts 70 minutes and has 30 multiple-choice questions with three potential answers one of which is correct, and 10 true/false questions. Each question is worth 0.5 points.[1] There is no penalization for wrong answers.
The material to study for purposes of the continuous assessment includes the prior readings (PR) + class notes. The test is not open book. Only the material covered in class will be assessed during this test.
- Moot Court: Participation in the Moot Court is worth 30% of the final grade (up to 6 points). On the first day of class, the representatives of NOVA Assembleia will provide you with detailed instructions on preparing for the Moot Court, including how to sign up. Instructions will also be uploaded on Moodle in the special folder ¿Moot Court.¿
- Class participation: up to 2 points added to the final grade of the continuous assessment. Active and constructive participation is worth additional 2 points on the final grade obtained through 1) 2) and 3). These points are conferred at the discretion of the instructor at the end of the course. Participation in the class discussion of the judicial decisions assigned as a prior reading (PR) is especially valued to confer these points.
- Final exam (three-hour exam): written essay up to four pages on a topic covered in class. The material to study is included above under ¿Reference list¿.
The final exam covers the whole list of material included in the reference list above (section 5.).
The final exam lasts three hours and will contain a question that allows the student to connect the material studied. The essay should be up to two pages and must be written in English. The exam is not open book, and the study material cannot be consulted during the exam. While the candidate must demonstrate critical attitude by presenting her or his opinion on a certain matter, the candidate must also refer to the material included in the reference list to demonstrate that opinions have been developed upon and throughout her/his study of the material.
Subject matter
PART I History of the EU
|
||
1.
14.09 |
Introduction to the course
|
Introduction to the course Introduction to the moot court by NOVA Assembleia representatives |
|
History and philosophical origins of the EU
|
|
2.
15.09 |
History of the EU ¿ main treaties
|
|
3.
21.09
|
History of the EU ¿ the enlargement and Lisbon
|
|
|
Accession and withdrawal |
|
PART II Institutions of the EU
|
||
4.
22.09 |
Overview of the main institutions and government |
|
5.
28.09 |
The EU Parliament
|
EU Law Pills |
|
The Councils
|
EU Law Pills |
6.
29.09 |
The Commission
|
EU Law Pills |
7.
06.10 |
The Court of Justice
|
EU Law Pills (2 groups: also, institutions & gov¿t of the EU)
|
PART III Sources of Law
|
||
8.
12.10 |
Overview. Treaties and other primary law
|
EU Law Pills (2 groups: also accession and withdrawal) |
|
Regulations, directives, and decisions
|
EU Law Pills |
9.
13.10 |
Amendments to the treaties
|
EU Law Pills |
10.
19.10 |
Legislative procedure(s)
|
EU Law Pills |
PART IV Interplay with domestic legal systems
|
||
|
Applicability of EU law within domestic legal systems
|
PR: Van Gend en Loos
Costa Simmenthal Granital |
11.
20.10 |
Continues. Counterlimits |
PR: Tanja Kreil
Frontini ¿ Solange I, II Taricco
|
12.
26.10 |
Directives: vertical direct effects
|
PR: Ratti
Ursula Becker |
|
Directives: horizontal direct effects and consistent interpretation
|
PR: Faccini Dori
|
PART V Judicial remedies and state responsibility
|
||
13.
27.10 |
Main competences of the CJEU ¿ Infringement procedures & annulment |
|
14.
02.11 |
Continues. Preliminary ruling |
PR: CILFIT
|
|
State liability |
PR: Franchovic
Brasserie du pêcheur/Factortame III |
PART VI Fundamental rights
|
||
15.
03.11 |
Fundamental rights within the EU: An Overview
|
Stauder Hauer Grogan
|
16.
09.11 |
Continues |
Omega (PR) Schmidberger
|
|
Fundamental rights within the EU: Treaty Law
|
The protection of fundamental rights becomes positive law
|
17.
10.11 |
Rule of law crisis
|
|
PART VII EU Policies
|
||
18.
16.11 |
Free movement of persons
|
Citizenship, Workers, family |
|
Free movement of goods
|
PR: Cassis de Dijon + Keck Mithouard
|
19.
17.11 |
Free movement of capital + Free movement of services
|
PR: Gebhard + Vlassopoulou |
20.
23.11 |
Foreign and security policy
|
|
PART VIII Continuous assessment: Components 2 & 3
|
||
|
Review session
|
|
21.
24.11 |
Multiple-choice exam |
|
22.
30.11 |
Moot court |
Introduction and remarks
|
|
Moot court |
Session no. 1 The rule of law conditionality
|
23. 07.12 |
Moot court |
Session no. 2 The recognition of the bar exam for lawyers
|
|
Moot court |
Session no. 3 The free movement of ¿children¿ of same-sex couples
|
24. 12.12
|
Moot court |
Session no. 4
|
FINAL EXAM
|