Seminar in Performance Languages
Objectives
t is intended that doctoral students: 1) develop the conceptual and theoretical tools for the study that they want to develop in the field of scenic languages 2) deepen the links of their theme to both theories and creations of the history of scenic languages, in this history including contemporaneity 3) are able to discuss in a critical and discussable way works that they watch on video or live 4) are able to lay the foundations for their own and autonomous investigation on a theme, an author or a work, with a critical and well-founded perspective, presented, orally and in writing, in a clear and argued manner
General characterization
Code
03101729
Credits
10.0
Responsible teacher
Paulo Filipe Gouveia Monteiro
Hours
Weekly - 2
Total - 280
Teaching language
Portuguese
Prerequisites
Available soon
Bibliography
AUSLANDER, Philip, From Acting to Performance, London & New York, Routledge, 1997
BADIOU, Alain, Rhapsodie pour le théâtre, Paris, PUF, 2014
BISHOP, Claire, Artificial Hells- Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship, London, Verso BOOKS, 2012
BLAU, Herbert, To All Appearances: ideology and performance, New York, Routledge, 1992
BOGART, Anne, A Director Prepares: seven essays on art and theatre, London & New York, Routledge, 2004
CVEJIC, Bojana; VUJANOVIC, Ana. Public Sphere by Performance. Aubervilliers: Laboratoires Aubervilliers and
b_books, 2012.
FISCHER-LICHTE, Erika, Estética do Performativo, Lisboa, Orfeu Negro, 2019
Giersdorf e Yutian (EDS.), The Routledge Dance Studies Reader, 2019, NT/London, Routledge
LEHMANN, Hans-Thies, O teatro pós-dramático, São Paulo, Cosacnayfy, 2007
MONTEIRO, Paulo Filipe, Drama e Comunicação, Coimbra, Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, 2010
KRASNER, David; SALTZ, David Z. (eds.), Staging Philosophy: intersections of theatre, performance and
philosophy, Michigan, University of Michigan Press, 2009
Teaching method
For students who attend a minimum of 70% of the classes, evaluation will be mainly composed by a research, presented in two different stages: - an oral 60 minutes presentation, in a class to be defined by the professor, according to the subject (it counts for 20% of the final mark): - a written paper with a maximum of 28.000 characters with spaces (it counts for 70%) - the remaining 10% correspond to assiduity and participation in classes and visits to shows. To students with less than 70% of assiduity, be them students-workers or not, or to students who miss the oral presentation, evaluation will be done through a final written exam.
Evaluation method
Método de Avaliação - For students who attend a minimum of 70% of the classes, evaluation will be mainly composed by a research, presented in two different stages. To students with less than 70% of assiduity, be them students-workers or not, or to students who miss the oral presentation, evaluation will be done through a final written exam.(100%)
Subject matter
Based on the research interests of doctoral students, both the professor and colleagues will seek to broaden the field of theoretical and artistic references that they already bring. This work may include theories of communication and art, performance studies, philosophy, aesthetics, semiology, theories of literature, cinema, music and documentation, curatorial and programming studies. The studied arts can be theater, dance, performance, opera, musical theatre, circus and new circus or hybrid languages